C O N F I D E N T I A L

 
                                Item 3247
     "No officer in any branch of the public service, or any other
     person whose salary, pay, or emoluments are fixed by law or regula-
     tions, shall receive any additional pay, extra allowance, or compen-
     sation, in any form whatever, for the disbursement of public money,
     or for any other service or duty whatever, unless the same is
     authorized by law, and the appropriation therefor explicitly states
     that it is for such additional pay, extra allowance, or compensation."
 
There is no statutory authority for the payment of premiums for insuring
the lives of military and civilian personnel, and current appropriations
for military and civilian pay and allowances do not expressly provide
therefor.  It follows that the payment of such premiums from appropriated
funds is prohibited by the quoted section.  The statutory provision in
question is applicable to all military and civilian personnel of the
Army "whose salary, pay, or emoluments are fixed by law or regulations"
(24 Comp. Gen. 646 (1945).
                  
         d.  Private Citizens.  Section 3679 of the Revised Statutes,
as amended (31 U.S.C. 665(b)), provides:

         "No officer or employee of the United States shall accept
voluntary service for the United States or employ personal service in
excess of that authorized by law, except in cases of emergency involving
the safety of human life or the protection of property."

It is the policy of the quoted statute to prohibit the acceptance of
voluntary services which may provide a basis for future claims against the
Government.  The stated policy applies not only where legal claims for
compensation may arise from performance of the services, but also where
the circumstances surrounding the proffer support a reasonable possibility
that the services may provide the basis for seeking remedial Legislation
from the Congress.  The JAG is therefore of the opinion that the services
in question should not be accepted by the Department of the Army. In view
of this conclusion, it is unnecessary to consider the extent to which such
persons could exert claims against the Government by reason of disability
or death resulting from participation in the proposed experiments, or
whether premiums on life insurance for the said participants may be paid
from appropriated funds.
 
         e.  Contractors' Employees.  The applicability of the foregoing
considerations to contractors' employees is considered below:
 
             (1)  Legality of employment.  The authority of the Secretary
of the Army to contract for services necessary to effectuate research
and development activities is contained in section 104 of the act of 10
July 1950 (64 Stat. 322; 5 U.S.C. 235a), quoted in subparagraph a, above.
There appears to be no provision of law which would prevent a contractor
from employing his personnel upon experiments of the nature contemplated.
In the literal sense, no question of "acceptance" of the services in
question by the Government is involved, as the private relation of such an
employee is with the contractor rather than the Government. It devolves

                          C O N F I D E N T I A L
                                  273                                8

 
     

 

Last Page

Home

Next Page