|

36
K. DOD AND DVA HAVE REPEATEDLY
FAILED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AND MEDICAL FOLLOWUP TO THOSE WHO PARTICIPATE IN
MILITARY RESEARCH OR ARE ORDERED TO TAKE INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS.
A common theme voiced by military personnel who have participated in military research
or training exercises over the last 50 years is the lack of information about the risks
they faced and the lack of medical followup. World War II veterans frequently reported
that they heard about the adverse health effects of mustard gas and lewisite from
newspapers and television decades after they were exposed, not from the Department of
Defense or Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans and civilians who worked at the Dugway
Proving Ground and were exposed to a variety of biological and chemical simulants began to
question the association of poor health with work as they compared information among
themselves, not because of information provided by military officials. Veterans who were
inside atomic clouds from atomic testing heard nothing at all from their government after
they returned home from duty. Similarly, soldiers who knowingly participated in military
research designed to test the effects of hallucinogens on human behavior were never given
information to explain their hallucinations and suffered from severe psychological
disorders as a result. Even today, most of those who served in the Persian Gulf indicate
they have received no followup information about the investigational drugs they received.
It is the responsibility of DOD and VA to identify and keep track of veterans exposed
to potentially dangerous substances so that they can receive medical care if needed. Even
in situations where DOD believes an investigational drug is safe, such followup is
necessary to establish with certainty whether exposures were safe, or whether they
resulted in long-term side effects.
40
O. DOD HAS DEMONSTRATED A PATTERN
OF MISREPRESENTING THE DANGER OF VARIOUS MILITARY EXPOSURES THAT CONTINUES TODAY.
According to Dr. Leonard Cole, professor at Rutgers University, the DOD has denied the
possibility of harm from various exposures. However, in many instances the military
belatedly recognized that some exposures may be causing disease and death.157
Such denial, however, delays the availability of medical assistance to those harmed.
For example, the military has released chemicals and biological agents through outdoor
"open air" tests for over four decades. Some of these supposedly safe chemicals
and biological agents, referred to as simulants, were also released over populated areas
and cities.158 Although scientific
evidence suggested that the tests may have caused illnesses to exposed citizens, the Army
repeatedly claimed that these bacteria and chemicals were harmless until adverse health
effects convinced them to change the simulants used. The death of Edward .J Nevin was
associated with the release of one simulant. Serratia marcescens, over San Francisco in
1950.159 A subsequent court trial
revealed that on September 26 and 27, 1950, the Army sprayed Serratia marcescens from a
boat off the coast of San Francisco.160
On September 29, patients at the Stanford University Hospital in San Francisco began
appearing with Serratia marcescens infections. Although the judge denied the validity of
the plaintiffs' claims that the exposures were related to the death of Mr. Nevin, the
trial raised frightening questions about the selection of simulants. Serratia marcescens
is no longer used by the military as a simulant.
Dugway Proving Ground has been a site for "open air" testing of chemical and
biological agents for decades. The purpose of the tests is to determine how the agents
spread and survive, and their effect on people and the environment. Earl Davenport is a
veteran who participated in tests at Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, first as a military
employee and later as a civilian employee. He became ill in
- -------------------
157Hearing, May 6,
1994; testimony of Leonard A. Cole, Ph.D., professor, Rutgers University.
-
- 158Ibid.
-
- 159San Francisco
Chronicle, December 22, 1976, page 1.
-
- 160Cole, L.A. Clouds
of Secrecy, The Army's Germ Warfare Tests Over Populated Areas, Rowman and Littlefield,
1988, pp. 75-104.
41
1984 after being exposed to a chemical simulant called DMMP (dimethyl methylphosphate).
He had been spraying the chemical into the path of a laser beam when a sudden change in
wind blew the chemical all over his face and hair before he was able to put on a
protective mask. Although he was "wheezing and coughing" the next day, and his
symptoms lasted for weeks, the Dugway Army Hospital merely gave him cough medicine and
antibiotics. The Dugway Safety Office assured him that the chemical was safe. However, by
1988, officials at Dugway had reevaluated the simulant's danger, and were becoming
concerned that DMMP could cause cancer and kidney damage.161
Mr. Davenport is currently attempting to obtain compensation for his illness from the
Department of Labor, since his exposure occurred when he was employed at Dugway as a
civilian.
In 1992, several military personnel from the Arizona National Guard experienced
chemical burns during a summer training exercise at the Dugway Proving Grounds. According
to two physicians, a daughter from one of the guardsmen also received chemical burns when
she later handled her father's duffle bag. One of these doctors, Dr. Michael Vance, was
contacted by military officials and encouraged to modify his written findings on the
possible cause of the daughter's injury.162
He refused.
According to scientists and doctors from the University of Utah, there is great concern
over the potential health consequences not only for military personnel who work and train
at Dugway, but also for civilians who live in a small town and on an Indian reservation
near the Proving Grounds.
Moreover, physicians from the Utah Medical Society have complained about the lack of
information provided to the medical community about the agents that are used in Dugway,
despite repeated requests.163
According to Dr. Cole, the use of potentially harmful chemical and biological agents
continues at Dugway even today. For example, he testified that the Army uses a simulant
called Bacillus subtilis, "which is fairly harmless in many natural conditions, [but]
is recognized as a potential source of infection and can cause serious illness in some
people when they are exposed to it in large numbers and they inhale large numbers of those
microorganisms."164
Dr. Cole also
testified about the lack of informed consent at Dugway in recent months. For example, in November 1993, a test that was intended to evaluate whether chemical
agents could penetrate protective clothing used informed consent forms that did not
mention the chemicals.165
- -------------------
161Hearing, May 6,
1994; testimony of Earl P. Davenport, veteran and former employee, Dugway Proving Ground.
-
- 162Memorandum of phone
interview with Dr. Michael Vance, Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, March 21, 1994; in
Committee files.
-
- 163UMA Seeks Health
and Safety Controls at Dugway," Bulletin of the Utah Medical Society, May 1992, Vol.
40, No. 5, p. 1; "UMA Joins Lawsuit Against Army," Bulletin of the Utah Medical
Society, June 1992, Vol. 40, No. 6, p. 1; in Committee files.
-
- 164Hearing, May 6,
1994; testimony of Dr. Cole.
-
- 165Ibid.
Return to The RATS Home Page
 |