Were Four Corners Victims Biowar Casualties?
By John Horgan, Scientific American, November 1993

Could a mysterious disease that has taken at least 16 lives in the Four Corners region of the Southwest since this past May be related to the U.S. biological warfare program? In June, federal and state investigators blamed the outbreak on hantaviruses. Although hantavirus-related illnesses were unknown in the U.S. before this year, they have been studied by military and civilian researchers since the 1950s, when U.S. troops fighting in Korea became infected with a flulike disease that attacks the kidneys.

The virus, named after Korea's Hantaan River, is carried by rodents and is transmitted by airborne particles of the feces or urine of infected animals. The Four Corners illnesses were almost certainly caused in this way, asserts C. Mack Sewell, an epidemiologist for the state of New Mexico, who notes that the virus had previously been detected in deer mice in the area.
Rumors have nonetheless persisted among Native Americans and others in the Four Corners region that Fort Wingate, an army base near the epicenter of the epidemic, was somehow involved. In June, Senator Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico queried the Pentagon about possible biological warfare activities at the base. The Pentagon acknowledged that the fort was once used as a storage depot for chemical weapons but denied that biological weapons were ever held or tested there.

Yet Fort Wingate has served as a target site, or "impact zone," for missiles launched from other military bases, according to a former congressional investigator who requested anonymity. One possible launch site is the Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah, several hundred miles to the north. The army has conducted experiments at Dugway with both chemical and biological agents for decades. Dugway earned notoriety in 1968 when a jet aircraft from the site accidentally released nerve gas over a nearby ranch and killed thousands of sheep.

The investigator suggests that tests initiated at Dugway may have infected the Fort Wingate region with biological agents years ago. The epidemic may then have been triggered by demolition or other disturbances related to the decommissioning of Fort Wingate early this year.

There is also reason to doubt that all the Four Corners illnesses stemmed from hantavirus, the investigator notes. Fewer than half of the victims tested positive for hantavirus. Moreover, deaths were attributed not to kidney failure - the usual outcome of hantavirus infection - but from hemorrhaging of the lungs. Congress recently appropriated $6 million for a study of the Four Corners outbreak.

Whatever the conclusions of the study, the suspicion engendered by the accident shows the need for greater openness within - and perhaps demilitarization of - the biological defense program, argues Leonard A. Cole of Rutgers University, an authority on the history of biological warfare. "It would be in the army's interest to eliminate the conspiratorial attitude toward these outbreaks," he points out. This year, Congress required the Department of Health and Human Services to examine the feasibility of shifting some biological defense research from the army to the National Institutes of Health.
 
 
(Scientific American, ISSN 0036-8733, Copyright 1993 by Scientific
American, Inc., 451 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10017-1111.)
 

Return to The Trapline Page