Deseret News
Thursday, December 8, 1994


GULF-WAR DRUG TESTS BLASTED AS "RECKLESS"


Demo says military didn't warn troops of risks, links shots to mystery ailment.
_________________________________________________________________

Associated Press

 

The military displayed reckless disregard for the well-being of U.S. servicemen and women by administering experimental drugs to them during the Persian Gulf War, Sen. Jay Rockefeller says.

The drugs may have caused the mysterious illnesses collectively known as gulf war syndrome, and they probably did not protect soldiers against biological or chemical weapons, according to a 53-page report written by staff for the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, whose chairman is Rockefeller, D-W.Va.

"On far too many occasions, the Pentagon has shown a reckless disregard for the health and well-being of U.S. service members," Rockefeller said. "Soldiers who are exposed to dangerous substances without their knowledge or consent become veterans who do not receive the medical care and compensation to which they are entitled."

According to the report, the Pentagon did not get consent from many people taking the drugs because of a wartime waiver granted by the Food and Drug Administration. Even with the waiver, however, officials were required to warn everyone of the risk of the drugs, but they did not, the report said.

Some troops were threatened with punishment if they did not obey orders to take the chemicals, the report said. Many gulf war veterans also were ordered to tell no one about their vaccinations.

Rockefeller compared use of the drugs during the gulf war to gas-chamber experiments involving sailors and soldiers in the 1940s, radiation experiments from the 1940s to the 1960s, LSD experiments in the 1960s and the testing of biological and chemical agents that continue today at the military's Dugway Proving Ground in Utah.

Pentagon spokesman Jim Turner declined immediate comment Wednesday, saying the department had not seen the report.

But the Defense Department has said the drugs were administered only after the FDA approved their use for the war.

Although the drugs had not been approved for commercial marketing, they "were specifically allowed by FDA for the special military uses proposed by DoD. FDA allowed these uses because there was evidence they would be effective and no recognized alternative existed and because FDA thought the use would be safe," said Dr. Edward Martin - principal assistant secretary of defense for health affairs - during a committee hearing in May.

The most common symptoms reported by 150 servicemen and women surveyed by committee staff included fatigue, skin problems, memory loss, joint pain, headaches, personality changes, diarrhea, trouble with vision, shortness of breath, numbness, sores, bleeding and fever, the report said.

Some documents collected by the report's researchers suggest Pentagon officials understood the drugs' dangers before the gulf war, "but these risks were ignored because of fear that Iraq would use chemical and biological weapons," said a statement from Rockefeller's office.

The report concluded that the Pentagon had no proof that the drugs were safe and effective when it provided them to troops in the Persian Gulf in 1990 and 1991 or to servicemen and women deployed to the gulf two months ago.

"There is no question that U.S. troops were not adequately protected when they were sent to the Persian Gulf, and the investigational drugs and vaccines that were meant to help them could have harmed them instead," Rockefeller said.

The report recommended the FDA deny Pentagon requests for informed-consent waivers during war or the threat of war.

It also recommended that Congress:
 

- Authorize a centralized database for all federally funded experiments involving human subjects.

- Require all federal agencies to declassify most documents on research involving human subjects.

- Re-establish a national commission to investigate potential human rights violations in federally funded research.

- Allow soldiers to sue the government for compensation if they are victims of inappropriate experimentation.

 

 

Home

Return to Menu

Article 53

Last Page

Next Page